Google Maps as a Library Evaluation Tool
A LibQUAL+™ Content Analysis of University Libraries in Padang
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24252/kah.v14i3a1Keywords:
LibQUAL+™, Google Maps reviews, Library service quality, Content analysis, University librariesAbstract
Background: Google Maps reviews have emerged as an accessible, user-generated source of feedback on public and institutional services, including university libraries. However, the potential of these reviews as valid evaluative data for library service quality, particularly when interpreted through an established framework such as LibQUAL+™, has not been widely explored.
Purpose: This study aims to describe the frequency of Google Maps reviews of university libraries in Padang based on the LibQUAL+™ dimensions, identify the most dominant dimension, describe sentiment trends per dimension, and analyze the characteristics and patterns of complaints at each library.
Methods: The study employs a quantitative content analysis approach, using the LibQUAL+™ framework as both a categorization tool and interpretive lens. Data were collected via web scraping from seven university libraries in Padang City listed on Google Maps. Of 434 reviews extracted, 117 valid reviews were analyzed, yielding 214 data points.
Findings: The "Information Control" dimension dominated with 78 data points (36.4%), followed by "Library as Place" with 69 data points (32.2%) and "Affect of Service" with 67 data points (31.3%). In terms of sentiment, "Library as Place" received the highest proportion of positive sentiment (85.5%); "Information Control" was generally in good condition (78.2% positive) but required attention regarding maintenance of technological infrastructure; while "Affect of Service" was the most critical dimension, showing the highest proportion of negative sentiment (34.3%) and the lowest average star rating (3.51). These findings are largely driven by data from the Andalas University Library and the UNP Central Library, which together account for approximately 80% of the total data, meaning conclusions on "Affect of Service" more specifically reflect conditions at these two libraries.
Originality/Value: This study demonstrates that Google Maps reviews, typically viewed as informal user feedback, can be systematically processed into valid library service evaluation data through a quantitative content analysis approach grounded in LibQUAL+™. It offers a novel, low-cost method for library service assessment using publicly available user-generated content, expanding the applicability of LibQUAL+™ beyond traditional survey instruments.
Downloads
References
Al-Fajri, DS (2025). Provinsi yang warganya paling rajin pergi ke perpustakaan. GoodStats. https://goodstats.id/infographic/provinsi-yang-warganya-paling-rajin-ke-perpustakaan-ETTiR
Attaallah, H. R. (2022). From traditional to electronic word-of-mouth. International Journal of Research in Commerce and Management Studies, 4(06), 125–135. http://dx.doi.org/10.38193/IJRCMS.2022.4607
Audy, FV, & Rohman, A. S. (2024). Pengembangan dan pemanfaatan perpustakaan melalui kerjasama antar perpustakaan. Jurnal Perpustakaan dan Kearsipan, 4(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.24821/jap.v4i1.11052
Ayub, T., & Ganaie, SA (2023). User Opinion About SPS Public Library: A Study Of Google Map Reviews. Library Philosophy and Practice, 7772. https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/libphilprac/7772/
Barfi, KA, Parbie, SK, Filson, KK, Teye, MV, Kodua-Ntim, K., & Ayensu, E. (2023). Heliyon Assessing the quality of services at an academic library. Heliyon, 9(12), e22449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22449
Borrego, A., & Navarra, MC (2021). What users say about public libraries: An analysis of Google Maps reviews. Online Information Review, 45(1), 84–98. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-09-2019-0291
Budiman, S. N., Lestanti, S., & Erwan. (2024). Analisis Sentimen Berdasarkan Hasil Review Lokasi Google Map Menggunakan Natural Language Toolkit TextBlob dan Naïve Bayes. AMI: urnal hli uda ndonesia, 5(2), 114 - 126. https://doi.org/10.46510/jami.v5i2.311
Chen, C.-C., & Chang, C.-C. (2024). Evaluating Public Library Services in Taiwan through User-Generated Content: Analyzing Google Maps Reviews. Electronics, 13(12), 2393. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13122393
Cook, C., Heath, F., & Thompson, B. (2001). Users’ Hierarchical Perspectives on Library Service Quality : A “ LibQUAL + ” Study. College Research Libraries, 62(2), 147–153. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.62.2.147
Cook, C., Thompson, B., Heath, F., & Thompson, R. (2001). LibQUAL+: Service Quality Assessment in Research Libraries. IFLA Journal, 27(4), 264–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/034003520102700410
Creswell, JW, & Creswell, JD (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5 ed.). SAGE Publications.
Google. (2024). Menambahkan, mengedit, atau menghapus ulasan & rating di Google Maps. https://support.google.com/maps/answer/6230175
Han, S., & Anderson, C. K. (2020). Customer Motivation and Response Bias in Online Reviews. Sage Journals. https://doi.org/10.1177/1938965520902012
Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Reading, Massachusetts.
Huete-Alcocer, N. (2017). A Literature Review of Word of Mouth and Electronic Word of Mouth : Implications for Consumer Behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 8 (July), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01256
Husnah, Latifa, M., Zulfitri, & Rahmi, L. (2024). Inovasi Layanan Perpustakaan UIN Imam Bonjol Padang Untuk Pemenuhan Kebutuhan Informasi Dosen. Iqra: Jurnal Perpustakaan Dan Informasi, 18, 138–159. http://dx.doi.org/10.30829/iqra.v18i1.17948
Huynh, M. T., Tan, K. N., & Lam, H. B. C. (2026). Online communication as participatory culture: A case study of university students at Vietnam National University – Ho Chi Minh City. RENTAS: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastera dan Budaya. https://doi.org/10.32890/rentas2026.5.1.2
Jenkins, H., Clinton, K. A., Purushotma, R., Robison, A. J., & Weigel, M. (2006). Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century.
Khan, AM, & Pinjaman, FA (2022). Exploring the reviews of Google Maps to assess the user opinions about public libraries. Library Management, 43(8–9), 601–615. https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-05-2022-0053
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (2 ed.). Sage.
Kumari, K., & Sharma, S. (2021). Information-Seeking Behaviour of the Users of Academic Libraries : A Critical Review of Literature. Journal of Library & Information Technology, 41(6), 469–475. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.41.6.16646
Mardalena, CNM, Sirait, MA, Simbolon, N., & Mandowally, T. (2025). Transformasi Sosial di Era Digital dalam Perubahan Media Komunikasi Publik. JPIM: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmiah Multidisipliner, 1(3), 164–171.
Mitchell, R. (2015). Web scraping with Python : collecting data from the modern web (S. St.Laurent (Ed.); 1 ed.). O’Reilly Media.
Musa, I. R. (2023). Digital technologies in the means of communication. Al-Academy. https://doi.org/10.35560/jcofarts1211
Nurhidayah, R. D. A. P., & Novianto, A. S. (2025). Pengaruh Electronic Word Of Mouth (E-WOM) Dan Brand Experience Terhadap Loyalitas Pelanggan Melalui Keputusan Pembelian Sebagai Variabel Intervening Produk Skincare Y.O.U (Studi Kasus Pada Generasi Z Kota Malang). e – Jurnal Riset Manajemen, 12(01), 510–518.
Olga, V., & Ekaterina, L. (2022). Reshaping of communicative and cultural codes in the new global digital communicative sphere. SHS Web of Conferences. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202213400160
Pusat Data dan Teknologi Informasi Kementerian Pendidikan Tinggi, Sains, dan Teknologi. (2024). Yuk cari tau tentang Perguruan Tinggi di Indonesia! Pangkalan Data Pendidikan Tinggi. https://pddikti.kemdiktisaintek.go.id/perguruan-tinggi
Rizqiawan, H., Novianto, I., & Indrawati, T. (2023). Efektivitas Google Maps Sebagai Fungsi Promosi dan Media EWOM pada Pelaku Usaha Kuliner Surabaya. Jurnal Orientasi Bisnis dan Entepreneurship, 4(2), 153–165. https://doi.org/10.33476/jobs.v4i2.4139
Saptiyono, A., Watie, EDS, & Julianto, E. N. (2020). Analisis Isi Kuantitatif Berita Kegiatan Mahasiswa. Dinamika Sosial Budaya, 22(2), 284–293. https://doi.org/10.26623/jdsb.v22i2.2566
SAS Institute (Ed.). (2017). SAS Enterprise Miner 14 . 3 : Reference Help (1 ed.). SAS The Power to Know.
Saufa, AF (2023). Quantitative representation of school library service quality in Yogyakarta: Evaluation using LibQUAL+TM method. Library Management, 44(6/7), 426–436. https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-04-2023-0027
Shirke, PK (2025). Modern Information Services in Academic Library: An Overview. Gurukul International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 2394, 179–183. https://doi.org/10.69758/gimrj/2504i5vxiiip0027
Ullah, A., & Usman, M. (2023). Role of Libraries in Ensuring Quality Education at Higher Education Institutions: A Perspective of Pakistan. Inverge Journal of Social Sciences, 2(4), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.63544/ijss.v2i4.57
Warschauer, M., & Matuchniak, T. (2010). New Technology and Digital Worlds: Analyzing Evidence of Equity in Access, Use, and Outcomes. Review of Research in Education, 34, 179-225. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732x09349791
Wulandari, W., Sianturi, A., Rahmadiani, A., Nurinto, B., & Khofifah, J. (2023). Electronic Word Of Mouth On Visiting Decisions (Case Study On Google Review Lokawisata Baturraden). Journal of Tourism, Hospitality and Travel Management, 1(1), 17–22. https://doi.org/10.58229/jthtm.v1i1.8
Yulistia, GS, Elyasa, V. V., Habiburrahman, AR, Farrel, A., Kencana, H., Khomsatun, FU, & Nugraha, JT (2025). Kepuasan Mahasiswa Terhadap Perpustakaan : Menilai Peran Fasilitas Akademik di Lingkungan Universitas Tidar. Jurnal ISO: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora, 1, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.53697/iso.v5i1.2581
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Danar Wibowo, Rahmi Yunita, Nadiah Sifa Daulay, Muntashir
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
By submitting your manuscript to our journal, you are following Copyright and License
