A Critical Analysis of ‘Al-Miḥwar’: Maqāṣid al-Al-Syarī ‘ah as the Islamic Alternative to Human Rights

Authors

  • Fajri Matahati Muhammadin International Islamic University Malaysia
  • Benaouda Bensaid Islami Ilimler Fakultesi, Istanbul Sabahattin Zaim Universitesi, Turkey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24252/al-daulah.v15i1.67283

Abstract

Research Objective: The discourse of Islam and human rights, focusing on the role of Maqāṣid al-Syarī ‘ah as an alternative framework for understanding Islam's perspective on the intrinsic inviolability of human beings, through a critical evaluation of Al-Miḥwar 's treatment of ḥuqūq al-insān. Research Method: A qualitative, library-based critical-textual analysis was conducted on the primary text Ḥuqūq al-insān Al-Miḥwar Maqāṣid al-Syarī ‘ah, an anthology comprising three independently authored chapters by Shaykh Aḥmad Raysuni, Shaykh Muḥammad Al-Zuḥaylī, and Shaykh Muḥammad ‘Uthmān Shabīr, triangulated against classical Maqāṣid al-Syarī ‘ah scholarship and contemporary human-rights-theory literature. Results: Al-Miḥwar highlights a clear distinction between ḥuqūq al-insān and 'human rights' as separate concepts, and contends that Maqāṣid al-Al-Syarī‘ah provides a solid foundation for identifying and safeguarding the intrinsic inviolable aspects of human beings, surpassing current human rights discourse. Findings and Implications: Al-Miḥwar 's central claim   that ḥuqūq al-insān and human rights diverge because they proceed from irreconcilable sources of authority   is found defensible and consistent with classical maqāṣid scholarship, while three areas requiring further development are identified: the consequences of this divergence, Al-Miḥwar's relationship with international human rights law, and the precise linguistic construction of ḥaqq relative to 'rights.' Conclusion: Al-Miḥwar constitutes a substantial scholarly contribution, positioned to serve as a pivotal center (Al-Miḥwar) for advancing discourse and formulating an authentic Islamic alternative to human rights. Contribution: Beyond summarizing Al-Miḥwar, this paper offers the first sustained critical engagement with the book in English-language scholarship, demonstrates the analytical value of classical Arabic lexicography for explaining rights-duty relations in Islamic thought, and identifies concrete directions for future research. Limitations and Suggestions: As a qualitative, text-based critical analysis of a single primary source, this study does not empirically test the reconstructed ḥuqūq al-insān framework in applied legal or policy settings; future comparative and socio-legal research is suggested to pursue this.

References

Abdul Aziz, Shamrahayu binti. “Islamic Concept of Human Rights.” In Human Rights Law: International, Malaysian and Islamic Perspectives, edited by Abdul Ghafur Hamid @ Khin Maung Sein. Selangor: Thomson Reuters Malaysia Sdn Bhd, 2012.

Adil Hussain Bhat and Irfan ul Haq. “Islam and the Issue of Human Rights: Compatibility or Contradiction.” East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research 2, no. 2 (February 28, 2023): 599–612. https://doi.org/10.55927/eajmr.v2i2.2093.

Afsah, Ebrahim. “Contested Universalities of International Law. Islam’s Struggle with Modernity.” Journal of the History of International Law 10 (2008): 259–307.

Al-Amidi, Sayf al-Din. Al-Ihkam Fi Usul Al-Ahkam. Vol. 3. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub ’Ilmiya, 1980.

Al-Attas, Syed Muhammad Naquib. On Justice and the Nature of Man: A Commentary on Surah Al-Nisa’ (4):58 and Surah Al-Mu’minun (23):12-14. Kuala Lumpur: IBFIM, 2015.

Al-Bukhari, Muhammad ibn Isma’il. Sahih Al-Bukhari. Vol. 8. Riyadh: Darussalam, 1997.

Al-Bukhari, Muhammad ibn Isma’il. Sahih Al-Bukhari. Vol. 7. Riyadh: Darussalam, 1997.

Al-Farahidi, Al-Khalil ibn Ahmad. Kitab Al-’Ayn. Vol. 1. Dar al-Maktabah al-Hilal, n.d.

Al-Fazari, Abu Ishaq. Kitab Al-Siyar. Beirut: Mu’assasah al-Risalah, 1408.

Al-Ghazali, Abu Hamid Muhammad. Al-Mustasfa Min ’Ilm Al-Usul. Vol. 1. al-Qahirah: Al-Amiriya Press, 1324.

Al-Ghazali, Abu Hamid Muhammad. Ihya’ Ulum Al-Din. Vol. 1. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub ’Ilmiya, 1971.

Al-Jawziyah, Ibn Al-Qayyim. ’Uddatush Shabirin. Jakarta: Qisthi Press, 2010.

Al-Jawziyah, Ibn Al-Qayyim. Shifa’ Al-’Alil Fi Masa’Il Al-Qada Wa Al-Qadar Wa Al-Hikmah Wa Al-Taqlil. Beirut: Dar al-Ma’rifah, 1978.

Al-Juwayni, Diya’u al-Din. Al-Burhan Fi Usul Al-Fiqh. Vol. 2. Cairo: Dar al-Ansar, 1400.

Al-Maqdisi, Ibnu Qudamah. Al-Mughni. Vol. 13. Jakarta: Pustaka Azzam, n.d.

Al-Maqdisi, Abd Allah b. Ahmad ibn Qudamah. Rawdah Al-Nazir Wa Jannat Al-Munazir. Vol. 1. Mu’assasah Rayyan Li al-Tiba’ah wa Tawzi’, 2002.

Al-Nawawi, Yahya ibn Sharaf. Al-Minhaj Sharh Sahih Muslim. Vol. 17. Beirut: Dar Ihya al-Turath al- ‘Arabi, 1392.

Al-Naysaburi, Muslim ibn al-Hajjaj. Sahih Muslim. Vol. 7. Riyadh: Darussalam, 2007.

Al-Qarafi, Shihab al-Din. Sharh Tanqih Al-Fusul Fi Ikhtisar Al-Mahsul Fi Al-Usul. Misr: Matba’ah al-Khayriyyah, 1307.

Al-Sa’di, ’Abd al-Rahman. Tafseer As-Sa’di. Vol. 2. Riyadh: International Islamic Publishing House, 2018.

Al-Sarakhsi, Muhammad ibn Ahmad ibn Abi Sahl. Sharh Al-Siyar Al-Kabir. Egypt: Al-Shirkah al-Sharqiyyah li l-I’lanat, 1971.

Al-Syatibi, Ibrahim. Al-Muwafaqat. Vol. 2. Al-Khubar: Dar Ibn Affan, 1997.

Al-Shawkani, Muhammad ibn ’Ali. Fath Al-Qadir. Vol. 5. Damascus: Dar ibn Kathir, 1414.

Al-Sijistani, Abu Dawud Sulayman ibn al-Ash’ath. Sunan Abu Dawud. Vol. 3. Riyadh: Darussalam, 2008.

Al-Subki, Taqi al-Din, and Taj al-Din Ibn Al-Subki. Al-Ibhaj Fi Sharh Al-Manhaj. Vol. 2. Dar al-Buhuth Li al-Dirasah Al-Islamiyah wa Ihya al-Turath, 2004.

Al-Tirmidhi, Muhammad ibn Isa al-Sulami. Jami Al-Tirmidzi. Vol. 3. Riyadh: Darussalam, 2007.

Al-Zabidi, al-Murtadá al-Husayni. Taj Al-’Arus Min Jawahir Al-Qamus. Vol. 30. Kuwait: Dar al-Hidayah, 1385.

Al-Zamakhshari, Mahmud ibn ’Amr. Asas Al-Balaghah. Vol. 1. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub ’Ilmiyah, 1998.

Al-Zuhayli, Muhammad. Huquq al-insan Fi Al-Islam. Damascus and Beirut: Dar al-Kalam Al-Tayyib and Dar Ibn Kathir, 1418.

Al-Zuhayli, Muhammad. “Maqasid Al-Shari’ah: Asas Huquq al-insan.” In Huquq al-insan Al-Mihwar Maqasid al-syari’ah, edited by ’Umar ’Abid Hasanah. Qatar: Wizarah al-Awqaf wa al-Shu’un al-Islamiyyah, 1423.

Alfian, Alfian, and Teuku Muzaffarsyah. “HUMAN RIGHTS CONCEPTUALITY IN ISLAMIC AND WESTERN REALITY TERMINOLOGY.” Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik Malikussaleh (JSPM) 4, no. 1 (May 19, 2023): 207–16. https://doi.org/10.29103/jspm.v4i1.10238.

Alotaibi, Hajed A. “The Challenges of Execution of Islamic Criminal Law in Developing Muslim Countries: An Analysis Based on Islamic Principles and Existing Legal System.” Edited by Francis D. Boateng. Cogent Social Sciences 7, no. 1 (January 1, 2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2021.1925413.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Muhammadin, F. M., & Benaouda Bensaid. (2026). A Critical Analysis of ‘Al-Miḥwar’: Maqāṣid al-Al-Syarī ‘ah as the Islamic Alternative to Human Rights. Al-Daulah : Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Ketatanegaraan, 15(1), 45–65. https://doi.org/10.24252/al-daulah.v15i1.67283

Issue

Section

Article