Listening More, Interacting Less: Learner Agency in Indonesian Pre-Service Teachers’ Digital Listening
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24252/Eternal.V112.2026.A1Keywords:
EFL Listening, Informal Digital English Learning, Learner Agency, Listening Strategies, Subtitled VideoAbstract
EFL learners now do much of their listening outside class, on streaming sites, music platforms and phone apps. Research on listening strategies, however, still tends to ask which strategies learners prefer rather than how they combine them in everyday media use. Drawing on the notion of learner agency, this convergent mixed-methods study examined how 105 pre-service English teachers at Universitas Tidar, Indonesia, put together their out-of-class listening strategies. A questionnaire identified each student’s main strategy, and short individual interviews recorded every strategy students described. The interview codes were analysed for repertoire size, strategy co-occurrence and learner profiles, and the two datasets were integrated in a joint display. In the questionnaire, two thirds of the students (65.7%) chose a cognitive strategy, most often watching films with Indonesian subtitles or listening to English songs. In the interviews, most students (67.6%) combined two or more strategies, and nearly half (45.7%) paired songs with subtitled films. Four profiles emerged: single receptive listeners (26.7%), receptive combiners (45.7%), extenders who added interaction to receptive practice (21.9%), and a small interactive-only group (4.8%). Students who used conversation or language apps were less likely to rely on Indonesian subtitles (51.9% vs. 76.9%) and more likely to watch without them (29.6% vs. 11.5%). Interaction with other speakers was chosen as a main strategy more often than it was described in practice. We argue that digital media have expanded students’ access to English far more than their agency in using it, and that listening instruction should help students regulate the support they use and move from listening to interaction.
Downloads
References
REFERENCES
Al-Khresheh, M. H., & Alruwaili, S. F. (2024). Metacognition in listening comprehension: Analyzing strategies and gender differences among Saudi EFL university students. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), Article 2291954. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2291954
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE.
Carayannis, E. G., & Morawska-Jancelewicz, J. (2022). The futures of Europe: Society 5.0 and Industry 5.0 as driving forces of future universities. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13(4), 3445–3471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00854-2
Fakhri Alamdari, E., & Bozorgian, H. (2022). Gender, metacognitive intervention, and dialogic interaction: EFL multimedia listening. System, 104, Article 102709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102709
Fetters, M. D., & Tajima, C. (2022). Joint displays of integrated data collection in mixed methods research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221104564
Fievez, I., Montero Perez, M., Cornillie, F., & Desmet, P. (2023). Promoting incidental vocabulary learning through watching a French Netflix series with glossed captions. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(1–2), 26–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1899244
Fung, D., & Macaro, E. (2021). Exploring the relationship between linguistic knowledge and strategy use in listening comprehension. Language Teaching Research, 25(4), 540–564. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819868879
Ghorbani Nejad, S., & Farvardin, M. T. (2022). Roles of general language proficiency, aural vocabulary knowledge, and metacognitive awareness in L2 learners’ listening comprehension. International Journal of Listening, 36(3), 187–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2019.1572510
Goh, C. C. M., & Vandergrift, L. (2022). Teaching and learning second language listening: Metacognition in action (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Guetterman, T. C., Fàbregues, S., & Sakakibara, R. (2021). Visuals in joint displays to represent integration in mixed methods research: A methodological review. Methods in Psychology, 5, Article 100080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2021.100080
Lee, J. S., & Sylvén, L. K. (2021). The role of informal digital learning of English in Korean and Swedish EFL learners’ communication behaviour. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(3), 1279–1296. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13082
Lee, J. S., Xie, Q., & Lee, K. (2024). Informal digital learning of English and L2 willingness to communicate: Roles of emotions, gender, and educational stage. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 45(2), 596–612. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2021.1918699
Lin, Q., & Huang, J. (2026). Reconceptualizing language learner agency: A qualitative inquiry in interactive online classes. Interactive Learning Environments, 34(4), 2380–2393. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2025.2545951
Liu, G. L., Darvin, R., & Ma, C. (2024). Unpacking the role of motivation and enjoyment in AI-mediated informal digital learning of English (AI-IDLE): A mixed-method investigation in the Chinese context. Computers in Human Behavior, 160, Article 108362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108362
Liu, G. L., Darvin, R., & Ma, C. (2025). Exploring AI-mediated informal digital learning of English (AI-IDLE): A mixed-method investigation of Chinese EFL learners’ AI adoption and experiences. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 38(7), 1632–1660. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2024.2310288
Liu, G. L., & Ma, C. (2024). Measuring EFL learners’ use of ChatGPT in informal digital learning of English based on the technology acceptance model. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 18(2), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2023.2240316
Liu, G. L., Soyoof, A., Lee, J. S., & Zhang, L. J. (2025). Informal digital learning of English in Asian English as a foreign language contexts: A thematic review. RELC Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882251332309
Liu, G. L., Zhao, X., & Yang, B. (2024). The predictive effects of motivation, enjoyment, and self-efficacy on informal digital learning of English. System, 126, Article 103504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103504
Montero Perez, M. (2022). Second or foreign language learning through watching audio-visual input and the role of on-screen text. Language Teaching, 55(2), 163–192. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444821000501
Mulyono, H., Falah, Z. A., Suryoputro, G., & Ibarra, F. (2024). Exploring the influence of EFL teachers’ informal digital learning on creative classroom instruction: A cross-sectional study. Discover Education, 3, 187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00268-7
Mulyono, H., & Saskia, R. (2021). Affective variables contributing to Indonesian EFL students’ willingness to communicate within face-to-face and digital environments. Cogent Education, 8(1), 1911282. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1911282
O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press.
Reinders, H., Lai, C., & Sundqvist, P. (Eds.). (2022). The Routledge handbook of language learning and teaching beyond the classroom. Routledge.
Shamsi, E., & Bozorgian, H. (2024). Collaborative listening using multimedia through metacognitive instruction: A case study with less-skilled and more-skilled EFL learners. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 9, 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-023-00248-8
Soyoof, A., Reynolds, B. L., Vazquez-Calvo, B., & McLay, K. (2023). Informal digital learning of English (IDLE): A scoping review of what has been done and a look towards what is to come. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(4), 608–640. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1936562
Wallace, M. P. (2022). Individual differences in second language listening: Examining the role of knowledge, metacognitive awareness, memory, and attention. Language Learning, 72(1), 5–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12424
Zhang, Y., & Liu, G. L. (2025). Examining the impacts of learner backgrounds, proficiency level, and the use of digital devices on informal digital learning of English: An explanatory mixed-method study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 38(5–6), 1113–1140. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2023.2267627
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 ETERNAL (English, Teaching, Learning, and Research Journal)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright notice:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)







