Contextualization of Theft Criminal Verse in Indonesian Positive Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24252/al-daulah.v13i1.45284Keywords:
Theft, Criminal Law, Islamic Criminal Law, ContextualizationAbstract
Research Objective: This study investigates the significant abandonment of Islamic Criminal Law by examining its adaptability to contemporary contexts. It seeks to challenge the assumption that this legal framework is separate from modern legal systems through a historical analysis of Islamic jurisprudential influences on global punishment frameworks. Research Methodology: Employing a normative legal framework, the research adopts both conceptual and comparative approaches, specifically analyzing theft punishments within Islamic criminal law, Indonesian positive law, and Iranian positive law. Results: The comparative analysis reveals that, although all three legal systems share a common objective of deterrence, they employ distinct methodologies for punishment: Indonesian law predominantly utilizes imprisonment, Islamic law prescribes hand-cutting as a form of deterrent, and Iranian law implements a graduated system that ranges from finger-cutting to imprisonment. Findings and Implications: This research demonstrates that, despite the methodological differences in punishment approaches, each legal system bases its sentencing decisions on contextual factors, including the nature of the crime, the offender's background, and specific circumstances. Conclusion: While these legal systems share a fundamental goal of deterrence, they reflect different philosophical frameworks and cultural contexts. This underscores the idea that Islamic Criminal Law can be interpreted in a contextual manner, despite its distinctive punishment methods. Contribution: This study enriches jurisprudential discourse by challenging misconceptions regarding the contemporary relevance of Islamic Criminal Law. Limitations: The study's emphasis on a single category of offense restricts a comprehensive analysis of broader criminal law approaches. Suggestions: Future research should expand comparative analyses to encompass additional legal systems and a wider range of offenses
References
Al-Fādanī, Muhammad Yāsīn Ibn ‘Īsā. Ḥusn Al-Ṣiyāghah. Rembang: Al-Maktabah Al-Anwariyah, n.d.
Al-Ḥafīd, Ibn Rushd. Bidāyah Al-Mujtahid Wa Nihāyah Al-Muqtaṣid. Kairo: Dar Al-Hadis, 2004.
Al-Qaradhawi, Yusuf. Perkembangan Fiqh Antara Statis Dan Dinamis. Translated by Saifullah M. Yunus. Kairo: Maktabah Wahbah, 2022.
Al-Raḥman, Bahauddin Abd. Al-‘Iddah Sharḥ Al-‘Umdah. Kairo: Dar Al-Hadis, 2003.
Al-Ramlī, Shihābuddīn. Nihāyah Al-Muḥtāj Ilā Sharḥ Al-Minhāj. Beirut: Dar Al-Fikr, 1983.
Al-Zuhailī, Waḥbah. Al-Fiqh Al-Islāmī Wa Adillatuhū. Suriah: Dar Al-Fikr, 1989.
Al-Zuhri, Muhammad. Al-Sirāj Al-Wahhāj ‘alā Matni Al-Minhāj. 8th ed. Beirut, Lebanon: Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, 2016.
Basyit, Abdul. “Pengaruh Pemikiran Ibn Taymiyyah Di Dunia Islam.” Rausyan Fikr : Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Pencerahan 15, no. 2 (2019). https://doi.org/10.31000/rf.v15i2.1810.
Garfes, Harry Pribadi, and Khairunnas. “Batasan Memukul Anak Untuk Melaksanakan Sholat Menurut Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Positif.” Islamitsch Familierecht Journal 2, no. 02 (2021): 106–25. https://doi.org/10.32923/ifj.v2i02.2015.
Ghulām, Zakariyya ibn. Min Uṣūl Al-Fiqh ‘Alā Manhaj Ahli Al-Ḥadīth. Dar Al-Kharaz, 2002.
Hakim, Abdul Hamid. Al-Sullam. Jakarta: Makatabah As-Saadiyah Putra, 2008.
Kusnandar, Viva Budy. “RISSC: Populasi Muslim Indonesia Terbesar Di Dunia.” databoks, 2021.
Marsaid. Al-Fiqh Al-Jinayah (Hukum Pidana Islam) Memahami Tindak Pidana Dalam Hukum Islam. Edited by Jauhari. Palembang: CV. Amanah, 2020.
Miswanto, Agus. Ushul Fiqh: Metode Ijtihad Hukum Islam. Magelang: Unimma Press, 2019.
Muhammad, Abdullah ibn. Majma’ Al-Anhar Fī Sharḥ Multaqā Al-Abḥar. Turki: Al-Matba’ah Al-’Amirah, 1328.
National Legislative Bodies / National Authorities. “Iran: Islamic Penal Code,” 1991.
Nota Kesepakatan Bersama Ketua Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia, Jaksa Agung Republik Indonesia, Kepala Kepolisian Republik Indonesia Tentang Pelaksanaan Penerapan Penyesuaian Baasan Tindak Pidana R (2012).
Panca, Anang. “Info Terbaru Harga 1 Dinar Emas Saat Ini.” harga.web.id, 2022.
Penyusun Mu’tamar Islam di Jedah. Majallah Majma’ Al-Fiqh Al-Islami. Maktabah Al-Shamilah, 2008.
Qudāmah, Ibn. ’Umdah Al-Fiqh. Al-Maktabah Al-Ashriyah, 2004.
Rahardjo, Satjipto. “Hukum Progresif: Hukum Yang Membebaskan.” Jurnal Hukum Progresif 1, no. 1 (2011): 1–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14710/hp.1.1.1-24.
Rokhmadi. Hukum Pidana Islam. Semarang: CV. Karya Abadi Jaya, 2015.
Sa’īd, Abū Al-Ḥasan ‘Alī Ibn. Manāhij Al-Tahṣīl Wa Natāij Laṭāif Al-Ta’wīl. Dar Ibn Hazm, 2007.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 M. Ainun Najib, Marli Candra
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors of a work hold the copyright and grant the Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Ketatanegaraan the right of first publication. The work is also licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which enables others to share the work while acknowledging the authorship and initial publication in the journal. The authors can make separate contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work, such as by posting it to an institutional repository or editing it for a book, with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. Authors are allowed and encouraged to post their work online, such as in institutional repositories or on their website, before and during the submission process. This can lead to productive exchanges and greater citation of the published work.
