Law Enforcement of Paper Rupiah Mutilation Practice from the Perspective of Law Number 7 of 2011 Concerning Currency and Jarimah Ta’zir

Authors

  • Faishal Agil Al Munawar Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
  • Yuanggi Nur Wiria Tarita Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24252/al-daulah.v13i1.47759

Keywords:

Law Enforcement; Paper Rupiah Mutilation Practice; Jarimah Ta’zir.

Abstract

Research Objective: This study examines law enforcement measures against rupiah bill mutilation by Bank Indonesia's Malang office, analyzing legal frameworks and enforcement strategies.Research Methodology: The study uses an empirical juridical approach with sociology of law emphasis. Data was collected through interviews, documentation analysis, and literature review.Results:Bank Indonesia Malang implements public education, awareness initiatives, formal warnings, and inter-agency collaboration to address currency mutilation.Findings and Implications: Currency mutilation violates Law No. 7/2011 on Currency and Islamic law principles. Offenders face imprisonment, fines, and other sanctions reflecting the economic significance of currency protection.Conclusion:Indonesia maintains a comprehensive legal framework against currency mutilation. Bank Indonesia Malang actively enforces these regulations through preventive and punitive measures within national and Islamic legal structures.Contribution: This research documents practical enforcement strategies, examines regulatory implementation at regional levels, highlights Islamic legal principles integration, and provides reference for comparative studies.Limitations and Suggestions: Geographic focus on Malang limits generalization. Future research should compare multiple regions, measure awareness campaign effectiveness, explore technological solutions, examine cross-jurisdictional enforcement, and assess public compliance with currency protection regulations

References

Admin. “Fakta: Beredar Imbauan Mengenai Fenomena Uang Rupiah Mutilasi.” DISKOMINFOSP. Accessed February 5, 2024. https://diskominfo.tubankab.go.id/entry/fakta-beredar-imbauan-mengenai-fenomena-uang-rupiah-mutilasi.

Al-Mawardi, al-Bagdadi. Al-Ahkam Al-Sulthaniyah. Jakarta: Darul Falah, 2006.

Ashshofa, Burhan. Metode penelitian hukum. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2004.

Ayuningrum, Retno. “Awas Uang Mutilasi Beredar! Ini Tips Agar Tak Tertipu.” detikjatim. Accessed February 5, 2024. https://www.detik.com/jatim/bisnis/d-6921672/awas-uang-mutilasi-beredar-ini-tips-agar-tak-tertipu.

Az-Zuhaili, Wahbah. Fiqih Islam Wa Adillatuhu Jilid 7. Gema Insani Press, 2011.

Bank Indonesia Regulation Number 21/10/PBI/2019 of 2019 concerning Rupiah Money Management.

Board of Governors Regulation Number 19/13/Padg/2017 on Rupiah Money Exchange.

Citranu. “Asas Legalitas Sebagai Pondasi Hukum Pidana Persfektif Filsafat Hukum.” Belom Bahadat 8, no. 1 (June 30, 2019). https://doi.org/10.33363/bb.v8i1.343.

Dewi, Margamu Desy Putri. “Faktor Penyebab Pengedaran Rupiah Palsu di Indonesia,” Adigama Law Journal, no. 4 (2021): 3792.

Harefa, Panca Gunawan, Idham, and Erniyanti. “Analisis Teori Hukum Terhadap Penegakan Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Uang: Analisis Teori Hukum Positif dan Teori Hukum Responsif.” Scientific Journal of Law and Human Rights 2, no. 2 (March 1, 2023): 113–119. https://doi.org/10.35912/jihham.v2i2.1923.

Irfan, Muhammad Nurul. Hukum pidana Islam. First printing. Jakarta: Penerbit Amzah, 2016.

Latukau, Fikry, Deassy J.A. Hehanussa, and Erwin Ubwarin. “Penerapan Pasal 33 Ayat (2) Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2011 Tentang Mata Uang di Maluku.” de Jure Scientific Journal of Legal Science 2, no. 1 (April 20, 2021): 54. https://doi.org/10.33387/dejure.v2i1.2955.

Law No. 7/2011 on Currency.

Yusuf, Muri. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif & Penelitian Gabungan. Prenada Media, 2016.

Muhammadun, Muzdalifah. “Konsep Kejahatan Dalam Al-Quran,” Diktum Law Journal, no.1 (2011): 24.

Munajat, Makhrus. Hukum pidana Islam di Indonesia. First Printing. Yogyakarta: Academic Affairs, UIN Sunan Kalijaga, 2008.

Nasution, Bahder Johan. Metode Penelitiuan Ilmu Hukum. CV. Mandar Maju, t.t.

Publishermp2. “Kepala Kantor Perwakilan Bank Indonesia Malang, Dikukuhkan Deputi Gubernur Senior Bank Indonesia.” Malang-Post.Com (blog), March 6, 2024, accessed on April 15, 2024 https://malang-post.com/2024/03/06/kepala-kantor-perwakilan-bank-indonesia-malang-dikukuhkan-deputi-gubernur-senior-bank-indonesia/.

Rays, H. M. Ikhwan. “Kajian Normatif Terhadap Kejahatan Pemalsuan Uang di Indonesia.” Yustisiabel Journal 3, no. 1 (April 30, 2019): 25–46. https://doi.org/10.32529/yustisiabel.v3i1.292.

Sonata, Depri Liber. “Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris: Karakteristik Khas dari Metode Meneliti Hukum.” Fiat Justisia: Journal of Law Science 8, no. 1 (November 5, 2015). https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v8no1.283.

Vitto Andhika Putra, Faisal Alif Bima Saputra, Willy Wendy Fernando, Shafira Marsa, Rizky Karo Karo, and M. Naufal Shidqi Dhiyaulhaq. “Perkembangan Hukum Menanggapi Ancaman Perkembangan Teknologi Pada Pembuatan dan Peredaran Rupiah Palsu di Indonesia.” Journal of Lemhannas RI 10, no. 3 (October 9, 2022): 51–63. https://doi.org/10.55960/jlri.v10i3.297.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-30

How to Cite

Al Munawar, F. A., & Wiria Tarita, Y. N. . (2024). Law Enforcement of Paper Rupiah Mutilation Practice from the Perspective of Law Number 7 of 2011 Concerning Currency and Jarimah Ta’zir. Al-Daulah : Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Ketatanegaraan, 13(1), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.24252/al-daulah.v13i1.47759

Issue

Section

Article

Similar Articles

> >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.