Contextualization of Theft Criminal Verse in Indonesian Positive Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24252/al-daulah.v13i1.45284Keywords:
Theft, Criminal Law, Islamic Criminal Law, ContextualizationAbstract
Research Objective: This study investigates the significant abandonment of Islamic Criminal Law by examining its adaptability to contemporary contexts. It seeks to challenge the assumption that this legal framework is separate from modern legal systems through a historical analysis of Islamic jurisprudential influences on global punishment frameworks. Research Methodology: Employing a normative legal framework, the research adopts both conceptual and comparative approaches, specifically analyzing theft punishments within Islamic criminal law, Indonesian positive law, and Iranian positive law. Results: The comparative analysis reveals that, although all three legal systems share a common objective of deterrence, they employ distinct methodologies for punishment: Indonesian law predominantly utilizes imprisonment, Islamic law prescribes hand-cutting as a form of deterrent, and Iranian law implements a graduated system that ranges from finger-cutting to imprisonment. Findings and Implications: This research demonstrates that, despite the methodological differences in punishment approaches, each legal system bases its sentencing decisions on contextual factors, including the nature of the crime, the offender's background, and specific circumstances. Conclusion: While these legal systems share a fundamental goal of deterrence, they reflect different philosophical frameworks and cultural contexts. This underscores the idea that Islamic Criminal Law can be interpreted in a contextual manner, despite its distinctive punishment methods. Contribution: This study enriches jurisprudential discourse by challenging misconceptions regarding the contemporary relevance of Islamic Criminal Law. Limitations: The study's emphasis on a single category of offense restricts a comprehensive analysis of broader criminal law approaches. Suggestions: Future research should expand comparative analyses to encompass additional legal systems and a wider range of offenses
References
Al-Anshari, Zakariyya. Ghayah al-Wushul. Surabaya: Al-Hidayah, n.d.
Al-Fādanī, Muhammad Yāsīn Ibn ‘Īsā. Ḥusn Al-Ṣiyāghah. Rembang: Al-Maktabah Al-Anwariyah, n.d.
Al-Ḥafīd, Ibn Rushd. Bidāyah Al-Mujtahid Wa Nihāyah Al-Muqtaṣid. Kairo: Dar Al-Hadis, 2004.
Al-Qaradhawi, Yusuf. Perkembangan Fiqh Antara Statis Dan Dinamis. Translated by Saifullah M. Yunus. Kairo: Maktabah Wahbah, 2022.
Al-Ramlī, Shihābuddīn. Nihāyah Al-Muḥtāj Ilā Sharḥ Al-Minhāj. Beirut: Dar Al-Fikr, 1983.
Al-Zuhailī, Waḥbah. Al-Fiqh Al-Islāmī Wa Adillatuhū. Suriah: Dar Al-Fikr, 1989.
Al-Zuhri, Muhammad. Al-Sirāj Al-Wahhāj ‘alā Matni Al-Minhāj. 8th ed. Beirut, Lebanon: Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, 2016.
Annisa Nuril Hakim, Gayuh, and Munawir Munawir. “Hukum Potong Tangan Dalam Qs. Al-Maidah Ayat 38.” Al Furqan: Jurnal Ilmu Al Quran Dan Tafsir 6, no. 2 (December 20, 2023): 190–207. https://doi.org/10.58518/alfurqon.v6i2.1916.
Aroma Elmina Martha, Agus Triyanta, and Bayu Mogana Putra. “Theft Punishment In Islamic Law And Indonesian Criminal Law: Initiative For Harmonization From The Perspective Of Sharur’s Boundary Theory.” Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law 12, no. 2 (August 31, 2024): 436–46. https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol12no2.663.
Basyit, Abdul. “Pengaruh Pemikiran Ibn Taymiyyah Di Dunia Islam.” Rausyan Fikr : Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Pencerahan 15, no. 2 (2019). https://doi.org/10.31000/rf.v15i2.1810.
Danial, Danial. “Criminalization in Islamic Penal Code: A Study of Principles, Criminalization Methods, and Declining Variations.” Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun 11, no. 3 (September 30, 2023): 1005. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v11i3.1058.
Djalaluddin, Muhammad Mawardi, Bulqia Mas’ud, Dedy Sumardi, Isnawardatul Bararah, and Kamus Kamus. “The Implementation of Ta’zīr Punishment as an Educational Reinforcement in Islamic Law.” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 7, no. 1 (March 31, 2023): 399. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v7i1.15101.
Garfes, Harry Pribadi, and Khairunnas. “Batasan Memukul Anak Untuk Melaksanakan Sholat Menurut Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Positif.” Islamitsch Familierecht Journal 2, no. 02 (2021): 106–25. https://doi.org/10.32923/ifj.v2i02.2015.
Hakim, Abdul Hamid. Al-Sullam. Jakarta: Makatabah As-Saadiyah Putra, 2008.
Ichwan, Moh. Nor, David Ming, and Mokh Sya’roni. “Bridging Tradition and Modernity: Integrating Classical Interpretation and Modern Hermeneutics through Ijtihad in Qur’an Studies.” Pharos Journal of Theology, no. 106.2 (March 2025). https://doi.org/10.46222/pharosjot.106.2021.
Ishaq, Ishaq, and Muannif Ridwan. “A Study of Umar Bin Khatab’s Ijtihad to Formulate Islamic Law Reform.” Cogent Social Sciences 9, no. 2 (December 15, 2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2265522.
Kusnandar, Viva Budy. “RISSC: Populasi Muslim Indonesia Terbesar Di Dunia.” databoks, 2021.
Mahmoud, Amna Saleh Shaker, and Amer Yassin Eidan. “Imam Al-Maqdisi’s Jurisprudential Selections in the Chapter on Cutting Off Theft.” International Journal of Religion 5, no. 11 (August 16, 2024): 6498–6504. https://doi.org/10.61707/8d7ptg02.
Marsaid. Al-Fiqh Al-Jinayah (Hukum Pidana Islam) Memahami Tindak Pidana Dalam Hukum Islam. Edited by Jauhari. Palembang: CV. Amanah, 2020.
Moath Alnaief, and Kotb Rissouni. “A Critical Analysis of the Claim That Absolute Juristic Interpretation (Ijtihād) Has Ended.” Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization 12, no. 2 (October 11, 2022): 28–40. https://doi.org/10.32350/jitc.122.03.
Mubarok, Mohammad Nabil Iklil, and Saichul Anam. “Tantangan Implementasi Hukum Potong Tangan Pencuri Di Indonesia.” Ta’wiluna: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an, Tafsir Dan Pemikiran Islam 5, no. 3 (December 30, 2024): 551–62. https://doi.org/10.58401/takwiluna.v5i3.1739.
Muhammad, Abdullah ibn. Majma’ Al-Anhar Fī Sharḥ Multaqā Al-Abḥar. Turki: Al-Matba’ah Al-’Amirah, 1328.
Muhammad Husni dan Fathul Wahab. “Teori Nasakh Mansukh Dalam Penetapan Hukum Syariat Islam.” Jurnal Pendidikan Islam 4, no. 2 (April 15, 2020): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.37286/ojs.v4i2.70.
Muslim, Buhori, T. Wildan, Syarifuddin M. Saman, Nurchalis Sufyan, and Sitti Mawar. “The Arabic Language Contribution to The Istinbāṭ in Islamic Law of Acehnese Scholars.” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 6, no. 1 (June 27, 2022): 224. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v6i1.11732.
National Legislative Bodies / National Authorities. “Iran: Islamic Penal Code,” 1991.
Nota Kesepakatan Bersama Ketua Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia, Jaksa Agung Republik Indonesia, Kepala Kepolisian Republik Indonesia Tentang Pelaksanaan Penerapan Penyesuaian Baasan Tindak Pidana R (2012).
Panca, Anang. “Info Terbaru Harga 1 Dinar Emas Saat Ini.” harga.web.id, 2022.
Penyusun Mu’tamar Islam di Jedah. Majallah Majma’ Al-Fiqh Al-Islami. Maktabah Al-Shamilah, 2008.
Qudāmah, Ibn. ’Umdah Al-Fiqh. Al-Maktabah Al-Ashriyah, 2004.
Rahardjo, Satjipto. “Hukum Progresif: Hukum Yang Membebaskan.” Jurnal Hukum Progresif 1, no. 1 (2011): 1–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14710/hp.1.1.1-24.
Rokhmadi. Hukum Pidana Islam. Semarang: CV. Karya Abadi Jaya, 2015.
Sa’īd, Abū Al-Ḥasan ‘Alī Ibn. Manāhij Al-Tahṣīl Wa Natāij Laṭāif Al-Ta’wīl. Dar Ibn Hazm, 2007.
Salma, Salma, and Jarudin Jarudin. “Theft Prevention With Rahat as an Effort to Protect Property in Pasaman, West Sumatera, Indonesia.” QIJIS (Qudus International Journal of Islamic Studies) 8, no. 2 (December 30, 2020): 431. https://doi.org/10.21043/qijis.v8i2.5856.
Scott, David. Penology. London: SAGE Publications, 2008.
Sulaiman, Abu Al-Hasan Maqatil Ibn. Tafsir Maqatil Ibn Sulaiman. Beirut: Dar Ihya’ Al-Turats, 2003.
Takim, Liyakat. “Islamic Law and the Neoijtihadist Phenomenon.” Religions 12, no. 1 (December 23, 2020): 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12010006.
Taleb Pourmoghadam. “A Criminological Study of the Law on Reducing the Punishment of Penal Servitude Approved in 2019.” Power System Technology 48, no. 2 (August 2, 2024): 1084–1103. https://doi.org/10.52783/pst.615.
Tan, David. “Metode Penelitian Hukum: Mengupas Dan Mengulas Metodologi Dalam Menyelenggarakan Penelitian Hukum.” Nusantara: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial 8, no. 8 (2021): 2463–78.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 M. Ainun Najib, Marli Candra
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors of a work hold the copyright and grant the Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Ketatanegaraan the right of first publication. The work is also licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which enables others to share the work while acknowledging the authorship and initial publication in the journal. The authors can make separate contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work, such as by posting it to an institutional repository or editing it for a book, with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. Authors are allowed and encouraged to post their work online, such as in institutional repositories or on their website, before and during the submission process. This can lead to productive exchanges and greater citation of the published work.
