A Measuring Justice and Child Protection: A Juridical Study of Marriage Dispensation After the Enactment of Law Number 16 of 2019
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24252/al-daulah.v14i2.64136Keywords:
Marriage Dispensation Indonesia, Child Marriage Law 2019, Best Interests of the Child, Islamic Family Law Reform, Child Protection Religious CourtAbstract
Research Objective: This study evaluates the normative framework governing marriage dispensation in Indonesia after Law Number 16 of 2019 raised the minimum marriage age to 19 for both sexes, and assesses the adequacy of judicial reasoning in relation to the best interests of the child standard. Research Method: A normative juridical (doctrinal) design was employed, drawing on statutory and conceptual approaches. Primary materials include Law Number 16 of 2019, Law Number 35 of 2014, PERMA Number 5 of 2019, and religious court decisions. Secondary materials were drawn from peer-reviewed journals in Google Scholar and SINTA (2010–2025). Results: Dispensation applications surged by over 177%, from approximately 23,000 (2018) to 64,000 (2020), indicating that the reform redirected rather than reduced child marriage through formal channels. Judicial reasoning predominantly prioritizes premarital pregnancy over the child’s long-term welfare, falling short of the holistic standard required by PERMA Number 5 of 2019 and CRC General Comment No. 14. Findings and Implications: The dispensation mechanism operates as a legitimizing instrument rather than an exceptional safeguard. Unregistered marriages (nikah siri) leave children legally unprotected, exposing a systemic gap unreachable by judicial reform alone. Conclusion: Law Number 16 of 2019 has not achieved its protective purpose. Realizing its promise requires coordinated judicial, executive, and civil society reform grounded in the substantive application of the best interests of the child. Contribution: This study integrates maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah analysis with statutory child protection standards, offering a multi-framework evaluation and institutional reform proposals across five key actors. Limitations and Suggestions: As a doctrinal study, this study does not capture empirical data on judges’ attitudes and applicants’ profiles. Future research should employ mixed-methods approaches to examine judicial decision-making patterns and the effectiveness of community-based interventions.
References
Ariyanti S. Yatiti, et al., "Analisis Hukum Terhadap Penetapan Dispensasi Perkawinan Dipengadilan Agama Gorontalo" PESHUM: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial Dan Humaniora. Vol.4, No.6, (Oktober 2025): 8869.
Fitriyani and Sudirman L., “Judicial Considerations in Granting Marriage Dispensation,” Al-Mizan, Vol. 19 No. 1, (2023): 111–115.
Hernawan, “Marriage Dispensation from the Perspective of the Best Interests of the Child,” Al-Qalam, Vol. 17 No. 5, (2023): 3502.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud, Legal Research: Revised Edition, Jakarta: Kencana, (2021).
Muhari, Muhar, “The Implementation of Law Number 16 of 2019 on Marriage Dispensation,” Presidensial: Journal of Law and Public Policy, Vol. 2 No. 1, (2025): 44.
Parera, Rikser, “Legal Protection for Underage Children Applying for Marriage Dispensation,” Ensiklopedia of Journal, Vol. 7 No. 3, (2025): 384–386.
Pasaribu, Artha Febilla , et al., "Dispensasi Perkawinan Anak Di Bawah Umur Pasca Berlakunya Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2019 Tentang Perkawinan". Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum (Jimfh). Volume 8, Nomor 2, (2025): 14.
Purnomo, Fajar Galih, “Marriage Dispensation After the Enactment of Law Number 16 of 2019,” Proceedings Series on Social Sciences & Humanities, Vol. 17, (2024): 209.
Safira, Levana, “Legal Protection for Underage Marriage Without Court Dispensation,” Acta Diurnal: Journal of Notarial Law, Vol. 4 No. 2, (2021): 214.
Sarip, Muhamad Azhar Assidiqi Nur., Dispensasi Kawin Dalam Pertimbangan Hakim Menurut Undang-Undang Perlindungan Anak Di Pengadilan Agama Kota Depok. Skripsi: Program Studi Hukum Keluarga, Fakultas Syariah Dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah, Jakarta 2024.
Shantya, Dini, “Disparities in Marriage Dispensation and Child Protection,” As-Syar’i, Vol. 7 No. 3, (2025): 374.
Sugianto, Fajar, “Statutory Approach in Normative Legal Research,” Jurnal Rechtsvinding, Vol. 10 No. 2, (2021): 245–247.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Vivi Novita Yulambangsari Bambang Hariyanto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors of a work hold the copyright and grant the Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Ketatanegaraan the right of first publication. The work is also licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which enables others to share the work while acknowledging the authorship and initial publication in the journal. The authors can make separate contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work, such as by posting it to an institutional repository or editing it for a book, with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. Authors are allowed and encouraged to post their work online, such as in institutional repositories or on their website, before and during the submission process. This can lead to productive exchanges and greater citation of the published work.
