Issue

Vol. 13 No. 1 (2026): June

Date Log

Submitted
6 April 2026
Accepted
28 April 2026
Published
1 June 2026

Copyright (c) 2026 Johan Pratama Siahainenia, Thomas Stefanus Kaihatu, Fulgentius Danardana Murwani (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Normative Visibility and Reference Price Signals In TikTok Live Pay-What-You-Want Gifting

https://doi.org/10.24252/minds.v13i1.66788
Johan Pratama Siahainenia
Universitas Ciputra Surabaya, Indonesia
Thomas Stefanus Kaihatu
Universitas Ciputra, Indonesia
Fulgentius Danardana Murwani
Universitas Ciputra, Indonesia

Corresponding Author(s) : Johan Pratama Siahainenia

[email protected]

Jurnal Minds: Manajemen Ide dan Inspirasi, Vol. 13 No. 1 (2026): June

Abstract

Live-streaming platforms increasingly rely on Pay-What-You-Want (PWYW) gifting, yet voluntary payments remain weakly coordinated when prices are not fixed. This study examines whether platform-displayed reference price signals increase PWYW gifting propensity and whether this effect depends on Subjective Norms. Drawing on a digital distribution-channel coordination perspective, the study treats reference prices as interface-based price signals and Subjective Norms as informal social governance. Using survey data from 200 Indonesian Gen Z TikTok Live users and Hayes’ PROCESS Model 1, the findings show that reference price signals do not directly increase gifting propensity. Instead, their effect becomes positive and significant only when Subjective Norms are high. The study demonstrates that price anchors in live-streaming platforms are not behaviorally sufficient on their own; they gain force when embedded in visible social expectations that coordinate discretionary contribution.

Keywords

Pay-What-You-Want External Reference Price Subjective Norms Normative Visibility TikTok Live
Siahainenia, J. P., Kaihatu, T. S., & Murwani, F. D. (2026). Normative Visibility and Reference Price Signals In TikTok Live Pay-What-You-Want Gifting. Jurnal Minds: Manajemen Ide Dan Inspirasi, 13(1), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.24252/minds.v13i1.66788
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. Adaval, R., & Wyer, R. S. (2011). Conscious and nonconscious comparisons with price anchors: Effects on willingness to pay for related and unrelated products. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(2), 355–365. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.48.2.355
  2. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  3. Ariyanto, A., Hornsey, M. J., & Gallois, C. (2006). Group-directed criticism in Indonesia: The role of message source and audience. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 9(2), 96–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839X.2006.00186.x
  4. Chen, C. P. (2022). Hardcore viewer engagement and social exchange with streamers and their digital live-streaming communities. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 26(1), 37–57. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-06-2021-0074
  5. Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591–621. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015
  6. Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 1015–1026. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015
  7. Eriksson, K., Strimling, P., & Coultas, J. C. (2015). Bidirectional associations between descriptive and injunctive norms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 129, 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.09.011
  8. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
  9. Field, A. (2022). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (6th ed.). SAGE.
  10. Frederick, S., Kahneman, D., & Mochon, D. (2010). Elaborating a simpler theory of anchoring. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(1), 17–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2009.12.004
  11. Gerpott, T. J. (2017). Pay-what-you-want pricing: An integrative review of the empirical research literature. Management Science Letters, 7, 35–62. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2016.11.004
  12. Gneezy, A., Gneezy, U., Riener, G., & Nelson, L. D. (2012). Pay-what-you-want, identity, and self-signaling in markets. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(19), 7236–7240. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1120893109
  13. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.
  14. Hamilton, R. (2024). Consumer price evaluation strategies: Internal references, external references, and price images in consumer price perception. Consumer Psychology Review, 7(1), 58–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/arcp.1093
  15. Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
  16. Jacobson, R. P., Mortensen, C. R., & Cialdini, R. B. (2011). Bodies obliged and unbound: Differentiated response tendencies for injunctive and descriptive social norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(3), 433–448. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021470
  17. Jung, M. H., Perfecto, H., & Nelson, L. D. (2016). Anchoring in payment: Evaluating a judgmental heuristic in field-experimental settings. Journal of Marketing Research, 53(3), 354–368. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.14.0238
  18. Kan, C., Lichtenstein, D. R., Grant, S. J., & Janiszewski, C. (2014). Strengthening the influence of advertised reference prices through information priming. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(6), 1078–1096. https://doi.org/10.1086/674059
  19. Kim, J.-Y., Natter, M., & Spann, M. (2009). Pay what you want: A new participative pricing mechanism. Journal of Marketing, 73(1), 44–58. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.1.044
  20. Lichtenstein, D. R., Ridgway, N. M., & Netemeyer, R. G. (1993). Price perceptions and consumer shopping behavior: A field study. Journal of Marketing Research, 30(2), 234–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379303000208
  21. Lin, Y., Yao, D., & Chen, X. (2021). Happiness begets money: Emotion and engagement in live streaming. Journal of Marketing Research, 58(3), 417–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222437211002477
  22. Liu, R., & Lapinski, M. K. (2024). Cultural influences on the effects of social-norm appeals. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 379(1897), 20230036. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2023.0036
  23. Mazumdar, T., Raj, S. P., & Sinha, I. (2005). Reference price research: Review and propositions. Journal of Marketing, 69(4), 84–102. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.84
  24. Murtadlo, M., Albana, H., Helmy, M., Libriyanti, Y., Izazy, N., & Saloom, G. (2024). Preserving the gotong royong character for Indonesian Gen-Z in the digital era. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 13(3), 1631–1642. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i3.27175
  25. Niedrich, R. W., Sharma, S., & Wedell, D. H. (2001). Reference price and price perceptions: A comparison of alternative models. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(3), 339–354. https://doi.org/10.1086/323726
  26. Rabbanee, F. K., Roy, R., & Sharma, P. (2022). Contextual differences in the moderating effects of price consciousness and social desirability in PWYW pricing. Journal of Business Research, 141, 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.092
  27. Rimal, R. N., & Lapinski, M. K. (2015). A re-explication of social norms, ten years later. Communication Theory, 25(4), 393–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12080
  28. Roy, R., Rabbanee, F. K., & Sharma, P. (2016a). Antecedents, outcomes and mediating role of internal reference prices in pay-what-you-want pricing. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 34(1), 117–136. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-08-2015-0157
  29. Roy, R., Rabbanee, F. K., & Sharma, P. (2016b). Exploring the interactions among external reference price, social visibility and purchase motivation in pay-what-you-want pricing. European Journal of Marketing, 50(5/6), 816–837. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-10-2014-0609
  30. Roy, R., Sharma, P., Chan, R., & Potdar, V. (2021). Exploring the role of the spotlight effect in pay-what-you-want pricing: An anchoring-and-adjustment perspective. Psychology & Marketing, 38(5), 866–880. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21474
  31. Santana, S., & Morwitz, V. G. (2021). The role of gender in pay-what-you-want contexts. Journal of Marketing Research, 58(2), 265–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022243721992056
  32. Shi, Y., & Wu, C. (2023). The influencing-factor model and empirical research of TikTok charity live-streaming: Impact on users' online charitable donation. PLOS ONE, 18(11), Article e0294186. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294186
  33. Sweeney, J. C., & Soutar, G. N. (2001). Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale. Journal of Retailing, 77(2), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00041-0
  34. Tang, Z. R., Hu, T. E., & Warkentin, M. (2024). Give to give: The gifting motivation and behavior in the social live streaming service. Journal of Business Research, 185, Article 114918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114918
  35. Viglia, G., Maras, M., Schumann, J., & Navarro-Martínez, D. (2019). Paying before or paying after? Timing and uncertainty in pay-what-you-want pricing. Journal of Service Research, 22(3), 272–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670519835308
  36. Vizuete-Luciano, E., Güzel, O., & Merigó, J. M. (2022). Bibliometric research of the pay-what-you-want topic. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, 22(5), 413–426. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41272-022-00414-6
  37. Xia, L., Monroe, K. B., & Cox, J. L. (2004). The price is unfair! A conceptual framework of price fairness perceptions. Journal of Marketing, 68(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.4.1.42733
  38. Xu, Y., Ye, Y., & Liu, Y. (2022). Understanding virtual gifting in live streaming via the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Human Behaviour and Emerging Technologies, 2022, Article 8148077. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8148077
  39. Yen, P.-H., Li, Y., & Liu, H.-H. (2024). Enhancing the profitability of pay-what-you-want: A study of suggested prices. Psychology & Marketing, 41(7), 1502–1513. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21993
Read More

Author Biographies

Johan Pratama Siahainenia, Universitas Ciputra Surabaya

Management Department

Thomas Stefanus Kaihatu, Universitas Ciputra

Management Department

Fulgentius Danardana Murwani, Universitas Ciputra

Management Department

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

<< < 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.