Analysis of Students’ Procedural Fluency in Solving Polynomial Division Problems in Senior High School

Authors

  • Triya Damayanti Universitas Tanjungpura
  • Mohamad Rif'at Universitas Tanjungpura
  • Nurfadilah Siregar Universitas Tanjungpura
  • Yulis Jamiah Universitas Tanjungpura
  • Agus Winarji Universitas Tanjungpura

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24252/mapan.2026v14n1a3

Keywords:

Mathematical Proficiency, Procedural Fluency, Polynomial Division Problems

Abstract

Procedural fluency is one of the core dimensions of mathematical proficiency essential for students’ success in solving mathematical problems; however, students often rely on a single strategy, use inefficient procedures, and make computational errors. This study aimed to analyze Grade XI MTK-2 students’ procedural fluency in solving polynomial division problems at a senior high school in Pontianak. Using a qualitative descriptive design, data were collected from 19 students through written tests and interviews. Data were analyzed through data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing, while validity was established through technique triangulation. The analysis focused on the indicators of accuracy, efficiency, and flexibility. The findings showed that students generally demonstrated procedural fluency by applying appropriate procedures and using more than one solution method, particularly long division and Horner’s method. Difficulties in accuracy persisted due to basic calculation errors and conceptual misunderstandings regarding polynomial structure and remainders. These findings indicate that procedural fluency in polynomial division depends not only on procedural execution but also on conceptual understanding, highlighting the importance of integrating conceptual and procedural learning and providing students with opportunities to learn and compare multiple solution methods in algebra instruction.

 

Abstrak:

Kelancaran prosedural merupakan salah satu dimensi utama kecakapan matematis yang penting bagi keberhasilan siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah matematika. Namun, siswa masih sering menunjukkan keterbatasan, seperti bergantung pada satu strategi penyelesaian, menggunakan prosedur yang kurang efisien, serta melakukan kesalahan perhitungan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kelancaran prosedural siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal pembagian polinomial pada siswa kelas XI MTK-2 di salah satu sekolah menengah atas di Pontianak. Penelitian ini menggunakan desain deskriptif kualitatif dengan melibatkan 19 siswa. Data dikumpulkan melalui tes tertulis dan wawancara, kemudian dianalisis melalui tahap reduksi data, penyajian data, dan penarikan kesimpulan, sedangkan keabsahan data diperoleh melalui triangulasi teknik. Analisis dilakukan berdasarkan indikator akurasi, efisiensi, dan fleksibilitas. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa siswa secara umum telah memiliki kelancaran prosedural yang ditunjukkan melalui kemampuan menerapkan prosedur yang sesuai serta menggunakan lebih dari satu metode penyelesaian, terutama metode pembagian bersusun dan metode Horner. Namun demikian, kesulitan pada aspek akurasi masih ditemukan akibat kesalahan perhitungan dasar dan miskonsepsi konseptual yang berkaitan dengan struktur polinomial dan sisa pembagian. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa kelancaran prosedural dalam pembagian polinomial tidak hanya bergantung pada pelaksanaan prosedur, tetapi juga pada pemahaman konseptual. Oleh karena itu, pembelajaran aljabar perlu mengintegrasikan pemahaman konseptual dan prosedural serta memberikan kesempatan kepada siswa untuk mempelajari dan membandingkan berbagai metode penyelesaian.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aksin, N., Miyanto, & Astuti, A. Y. (2019). Matematika untuk SMA/MA peminatan matematika dan ilmu-ilmu alam. Klaten: PT. Intan Pariwara.

Andal, S. G. B., & Andrade, R. R. (2022). Exploring students’ procedural fluency and written adaptive reasoning skills in solving open-ended problems. International Journal of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics, 2(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.53378/352872.

Barham, A. I. (2020). Exploring in-service mathematics teachers ’ perceived professional development needs related to the strands of mathematical proficiency (SMP). Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Educatio, 16(10), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8399.

Bay-Williams, J. M., & SanGiovanni, J. J. (2021). Figuring out fluency in mathematics teaching and learning, grades k-8: Moving beyond basic facts and memorization. California: Corwin.

Brahier, D., Leinwand, S., & Huinker, D. (2014). Principles to actions: Mathematics programs as the core for student learning. MatheMatics Teacher, 107(9), 656–659. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacher.107.9.0656.

Cartwright, K. (2018). Exploring mathematical fluency : teachers ’ conceptions and descriptions of students. Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, 202–209.

Codding, R. S., Burns, M. K., & Lukito, G. (2011). Meta analysis of mathematic basic fact fluency interventions: A component analysis. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 26(1), 36–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2010.00323.x.

Ekamornaroon, T., Ngiamsunthorn, P. S., Phaksunchai, M., & Chonchaiya, R. (2024). Identifying common errors in polynomials of eighth grade students. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 13(1), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i1.25131.

Firdaus, H. P. E. (2019). Kelancaran prosedural matematis mahasiswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah matematika. Prosiding KNPMP IV:Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

Foster, C. (2016). Confidence and competence with mathematical procedures. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 91(2), 271–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9660-9.

Haryandika, U. W., Utami, C., & Prihatiningtyas, N. C. (2017). Analisis kelancaran prosedural matematis siswa pada materi persamaan eksponen kelas X SMA negeri 2 Singkawang. JPMI (Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Indonesia), 2(2), 72. https://doi.org/10.26737/jpmi.v2i2.226.

Hidayah, N., & Firdaus, H. P. (2025). Peningkatan hasil belajar matematika materi polinomial melalui media pembelajaran tapolin pada peserta didik kelas XI. JagoMIPA: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan IPA, 5(3), 985–993. https://doi.org/10.53299/jagomipa.v5i3.2025.

Huliman, Sandie, & Muchtadi. (2025). Kajian kelancaran prosedur matematis siswa pada materi eksponen kelas X SMK unggulan Sambas. Jurnal Riset Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah, 9(1), 97–105. https://doi.org/10.21009/jrpms.091.08.

Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). Helping children learn mathematics. In Academic Emergency Medicine (Vol. 17, Issue 12). WashingtonDC: National Academy of Sciences.

Lenz, K., Reinhold, F., & Wittmann, G. (2024). Transitions between conceptual and procedural knowledge profiles. Patterns in understanding fractions and indicators for individual differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 116, 102548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102548.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). An Expanded Sourcebook: Qualitative Data Analysis. London: Sage Publications.

Nasir, N. M., Hashim, Y., Zabidi, S. F. H. A., Awang, R. J., & Zaihidee, E. M. (2013). Preliminary study of student performance on algebraic concepts and differentiation. World Applied Sciences Journal, 21, 162–167. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2013.21.am.21140.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2023). Procedural fluency, reasoning and decision making, not rote application of procedures position. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 2(8), 1–16.

NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards fot school mathematics. USA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Newton, N., Record, A. E., & Mello, A. J. (2024). Fluency doesn’t just happen in multiplication and division. New York: Routledge.

Nurkhasanah, I., & Ruli, R. M. (2023). Kelancaran prosedural matematis siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal hots persamaan kuadrat. Didactical Mathematics, 5(2), 273–281. https://doi.org/10.31949/dm.v5i2.5825.

Oktaviani, R. (2020). Mistake analysis of MA students solve math mathematics on polynomial materials. Journal of Educational Experts, 3(1), 25–30. https://doi.org/10.30740/jee.v3i1p25-30.

Pratidiana, D., & Muhayatun, N. (2021). Analisis kelancaran prosedural matematis siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal program linear. UNION: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 9(2), 189–201. https://doi.org/10.30738/union.v9i2.9369.

Putri, W. H., Fua, J. L., & Halistin. (2025). Analisis diagnostik kesulitan belajar bangun ruang pada siswa kelas V sekolah dasar: Tinjauan konseptual, prinsip, dan prosedural. Diniyah: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 6(2), 94–111. https://doi.org/10.31332/dy.v7i1.14235.

Rohimah, S. M., Putri, S. A., & Helsa, Y. (2026). Conceptual and procedural errors of pre-service elementary teachers in solving educational research statistics problems. Jurnal Elemen, 12(1), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v12i1.32327.

Russell, S. J. (2000). Developing computational fluency with whole numbers in the elementary grades. Teaching Children Mathematics, 7(3), 154–158.

Safitri, A., & Lestari, K. E. (2022). Analisis kelancaran prosedural matematis siswa berdasarkan kemandirian belajar. Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA, 8(2), 444–452. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v8i2.1979.

Samsuddin, A. F., & Retnawati, H. (2019). Mathematical etude: Killing two birds with one stone. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1200(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1200/1/012019.

Sari, N., Yusmin, E., & Nursangaji, A. (2018). Kelancaran prosedural siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal persamaan kuadrat di kelas X SMKN 2 Pontianak. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran (JPPK), 7(2), 274–282.

Sarirah, F. H., & Nurmalasari, M. (2024). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah dalam penyelesaian soal polinomial. Jurnal Pendidikan Sultan Agung, 4(005), 149–157.

Schulz, A. (2024). Assessing student teachers’ procedural fluency and strategic competence in operating and mathematizing with natural and rational numbers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 27(6), 981–1008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-023-09590-7.

Wedyastuti, R. (2023). Upaya meningkatkan hasil belajar polinomial menggunakan media interaktif live worksheet. Ideguru: Jurnal Karya Ilmiah Guru, 8(2), 171–178. https://doi.org/10.51169/ideguru.v8i2.427.

Yusof, A. A. (2021). The effects of a multiple solution method in mathematics learning for secondary schools The effects of a multiple solution method in mathematics learning for secondary schools. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1988(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1988/1/012048.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-23

How to Cite

Damayanti, T., Rif’at, M., Siregar, N., Jamiah, Y., & Winarji, A. (2026). Analysis of Students’ Procedural Fluency in Solving Polynomial Division Problems in Senior High School. MaPan : Jurnal Matematika Dan Pembelajaran, 14(1), 42–63. https://doi.org/10.24252/mapan.2026v14n1a3

Issue

Section

Vol. 14 No. 1

Similar Articles

<< < > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.