Issue

Vol. 12 No. 2 (2025): December

Date Log

Submitted
27 June 2025
Accepted
15 September 2025
Published
17 September 2025

Copyright (c) 2025 A. Ifayani Haanurat (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

From Faith to Firmness: Islamic Literacy, Ecosophy, and Management in Building Sustainable SMEs

https://doi.org/10.24252/minds.v12i2.58615
A. Ifayani Haanurat
Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar, Indonesia

Corresponding Author(s) : A. Ifayani Haanurat

[email protected]

Jurnal Minds: Manajemen Ide dan Inspirasi, Vol. 12 No. 2 (2025): December

Abstract

This study investigates the interplay of Islamic literacy and Islamic ecosophy in shaping business sustainability among 250 Muslim SME vendors, with Islamic management positioned as a mediating mechanism. As we embed religiously grounded constructs into a structural model, the research advances marketing scholarship with a novel integration of Islamic epistemologies and sustainability-oriented management practices. Using PLS-SEM, the results demonstrate that Islamic literacy directly enhances both Islamic management and business sustainability, while Islamic ecosophy contributes significantly through its effect on management practices. Islamic management itself emerges as a critical pathway translating Islamic values into sustainable business outcomes. These findings extend theoretical debates on faith-driven management by demonstrating the mediating logic of Islamic managerial conduct. The study provides practical implications for SME owners and policymakers, highlighting how nurturing Islamic literacy and managerial ethos can strengthen operational practices and advance long-term sustainability in competitive markets.

Keywords

healthy city institutional politics politics management healthy city management
Haanurat, A. I. (2025). From Faith to Firmness: Islamic Literacy, Ecosophy, and Management in Building Sustainable SMEs. Jurnal Minds: Manajemen Ide Dan Inspirasi, 12(2), 451–462. https://doi.org/10.24252/minds.v12i2.58615
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. Abdelzaher, D. M., & Abdelzaher, A. (2017). Beyond environmental regulations: How “Eco-Islam” can enhance environmental ethics in SMEs. Journal of Business Ethics, 145(2), 357–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2833-8
  2. Abdelzaher, D. M., Gong, J., & Vicinanzo, C. (2019). Ethical drivers of corporate social responsibility in Arab countries: The role of religiosity. Journal of Business Ethics, 160(1), 151–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3929-0IDEAS/RePEc
  3. Akhmadi, A., Raharjo, K., & Priyono, A. (2023). Islamic work ethics and prosocial voice behavior: The mediating roles of person–organization fit and organizational commitment. Cogent Education, 10(1), 2174064. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2174064
  4. Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
  5. Beusch, P., Frisk, E., Rosén, M., & Dilla, W. N. (2022). Management control for sustainability: Towards integrated systems. Management Accounting Research, 54, 100777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2021.100777
  6. Corsi, K., & Arru, B. (2020). The role and implementation of sustainability management control tools: Critical aspects in the Italian context. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 34(9), 29–56. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-02-2019-3887
  7. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
  8. Dimic, N., Orlov, V., & Piljak, V. (2024). Religiosity and corporate social responsibility: International evidence. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(1), 396–413. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2576
  9. DinarStandard. (2023). State of the global Islamic economy report 2023. DinarStandard & Salaam Gateway.
  10. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
  11. International Labour Office. (2021). World Employment and Social Outlook: Trends 2021. Geneva: ILO. https://www.ilo.org/publications/world-employment-and-social-outlook-trends-2021 (No DOI) International Labour Organization+1
  12. Johnstone, L. (2021). Facilitating sustainability control in SMEs through the implementation of an environmental management system. Journal of Management Control, 32(4), 559–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-021-00329-0
  13. Johnstone, L. (2022). Environmental management control systems in ISO 14001-certified SMEs: An exploratory study. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 13(6), 1337–1363. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-03-2021-0102
  14. Kaiser, T., Lusardi, A., Menkhoff, L., & Urban, C. (2022). Financial education affects financial knowledge and behaviors: A meta-analysis of randomized experiments. Journal of Financial Economics, 146(2), 594–636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.09.011
  15. Koehrsen, J. (2021). How “green” can religions be? Tensions about religious environmentalism. Energy Research & Social Science, 74, 101968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.101968
  16. Le Breton-Miller, I., Miller, D., Tang, Y., & Xu, L. (2024). CEO religion and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from US firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 190(3), 781–809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-024-05650-x
  17. Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2014). The economic importance of financial literacy: Theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Literature, 52(1), 5–44. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.52.1.5 American Economic Association
  18. Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2023). The importance of financial literacy: Opening a new field. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 37(4), 137–154. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.37.4.137 American Economic Association
  19. Machado, M. C., Vivaldini, M., & de Oliveira, O. J. (2020). Production and supply-chain as the basis for SMEs’ environmental management development: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 273, 123141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123141
  20. OECD. (2023). Financing SMEs and Entrepreneurs: 2023 Highlights. Paris: OECD Publishing. (Use DOI shown on landing page.) https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2023/03/oecd-financing-smes-and-entrepreneurs-scoreboard-2023-highlights_6060c026.html OECD
  21. Schilke, O., Hu, S., & Helfat, C. E. (2018). Quo vadis, dynamic capabilities? A content-analytic review and recommendations. Academy of Management Annals, 12(1), 390–439. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2016.0014
  22. Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities (4th ed.). Sage. (ISBN 978-1483301962)
  23. Teece, D. J. (2018). Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.007
  24. Terzani, S., & Turzo, T. (2021). Religious social norms and corporate sustainability: The effect of religiosity on ESG disclosure. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(1), 485–496. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2063
  25. Traxler, A. A., & Greiling, D. (2020). Sustainability reporting and management control: A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 276, 124271. (Verify DOI at proofs: commonly shown as https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124271)
  26. Udin, U., Handayani, N. U., & Yuniawan, A. (2022). The influence of Islamic work ethic on employee performance: The mediating role of organizational commitment. SAGE Open, 12(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221085263
  27. Vishwanathan, P., van Oosterhout, J., Heugens, P., Duran, P., & van Essen, M. (2020). Strategic CSR: A concept-building meta-analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 57(2), 314–350. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12514
  28. Wang, Q., Dou, J., & Jia, S. (2016). A meta-analytic review of corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance: The moderating effect of contextual factors. Business & Society, 55(8), 1083–1121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650315584317
  29. World Bank. (2022). Small and medium enterprises (SMEs) finance: Improving SMEs’ access to finance and finding innovative solutions. World Bank Group
Read More

Author Biography

A. Ifayani Haanurat, Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar

Management Department

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0

Similar Articles

<< < > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.